Mayar Sherif vs Lulu Sun Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Mar at 12:02 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Sherif vs L. Sun

EGY
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NZL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sherif 1 - 0 Sun
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mayar Sherif winning 2 and Lulu Sun winning 1. The last match between Mayar Sherif and Lulu Sun was at the Miami Open - Miami, 19-03-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mayar Sherif getting the victory 7-5 1-6 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sherif | 1 |
| Sun | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Miami Open - Miami(03-19-25)
M. Sherif vs L. Sun H2H Profile
M. Sherif vs L. Sun Match Preview:
What insights can we gather from the recent performance on second serves that might influence our match predictions? Over the past six months, Sun has exhibited a better command by winning 42.06% of points on her second serve, while Sherif trails with 36.26%. This statistic is often pivotal in making accurate match predictions and showcases Sun's edge in maintaining resilience on her second serve.
When we flip the perspective to the return game, Sherif steps into the spotlight. She has outperformed Sun in recent form, clinching 52.53% of her opponent's second serve points compared to Sun's 44.1%. On first serve return points, Sherif again leads with 35.76% against Sun's 25.37%. These numbers may shine a light on who holds the advantage in this head-to-head matchup.
Considering how each player handles pressure, we delve into their ability to save breakpoints. Sun has managed to save 59.35% of breakpoints she faced recently, slightly overshadowing Sherif, who has saved 52.04%. Such statistics can be significant for enthusiasts engaging in in-game betting, suggesting Sun's strong performance under pressure.
In the context of overall performance, Sun has won 57.41% of her matches in the past year, while Sherif stands just a bit taller at 58.06%. These figures provide a broad overview of each player's competitive edge. However, it is essential to weigh these percentages against the specific surfaces and competition levels they've encountered.
Turning to surface-specific performances, Sun shines brightest on grass with a 66% win rate, whereas she struggles more on clay courts with a 55% win rate. Contrastingly, Sherif's dominance lies on clay, boasting a towering 74% win rate, while indoor hard courts pose a challenge, with just a 25% win rate.
Examining the caliber of their opponents, Sun has faced competitors with an average rank of 156.78 over the past year, while Sherif has battled opponents averaging a rank of 142.53. This statistic offers a lens to assess the relative challenge each player has navigated.
In the decisive moments of a match, particularly if it goes to a deciding set, Sun emerges as the more reliable player, having won 75% of such sets in the last year compared to Sherif's 43%. This proficiency in clutch situations could very well tip the scales in Sun's favor during high-stakes moments.
In the all-important realm of breakpoint conversion, Sherif edges ahead with a 33.33% success rate, while Sun follows at 29.03%. Both players exhibit strengths that could dictate the match's momentum based on who seizes their opportunities better.
In an overall assessment, while Sherif exhibits superior return stats and an impressive clay court record, Sun's better second serve consistency, ability to perform under pressure, and prowess in deciding sets imply she might just have the upper hand in this encounter. Therefore, the scales seem to tip slightly in Sun's favor to clinch this anticipated match-up.
Mayar Sherif vs Lulu Sun Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Sherif vs L. Sun H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 15 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:18:12 | Average Match Time | 2:18:12 |
| 76% (83/109) | 1st Serve % | 66% (61/92) |
| 58% (48/83) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (40/61) |
| 62% (16/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (19/31) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (4/12) |
| 36% (33/92) | Return Points Win % | 41% (45/109) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Sherif Recent Matches Played
L. Sun Recent Matches Played

M. Sherif vs L. Sun Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.03% (308/173) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.76% (273/162) |
| 62.36% (681/411) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.95% (601/385) |
| 54.81% (5485/4523) | Games Win/Loss | 55.22% (4901/3975) |
| 48.00% (72/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.92% (176/91) |
| 73.04% (233/86) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.41% (47/41) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.44% (29/16) |
| 25.00% (2/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (21/14) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 838 | Aces Total | 1031 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 606 | Total Double Faults | 1223 |
| 1:31:10 | Average Match Time | 1:16:46 |
| 391.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 422.16 |
| 72% (19627/27267) | 1st Serve % | 60% (14260/23574) |
| 63% (12339/19627) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9434/14260) |
| 49% (3755/7639) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4494/9314) |
| 46% (1585/3481) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1357/2946) |
| 45% (12516/27792) | Return Points Win % | 45% (10795/24207) |
| 40.00% (14/21) | Slam W/L | 60.87% (14/9) |
| 33.33% (11/22) | Masters W/L | 47.62% (10/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 77.78% (7/2) |
| 42.86% (30/40) | Main Tour W/L | 56.82% (25/19) |
| 76.58% (170/52) | Challenger W/L | 62.44% (138/83) |
| 68.60% (83/38) | Futures W/L | 67.52% (79/38) |
| 64% (304/473) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (271/428) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 66% (70/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (44/82) |
| 50% (67/134) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (66/120) |
| 87% (315/274) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (269/241) |
| 13% (315/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (269/28) |
| 20% (166/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (166/33) |